Answers.com uses content from Wikipedia, and many other sources and displays them on one single page. I noticed that it is high ranked in google for lots of keywords.
Why isn’t it considered a mirror of wikipedia.
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- What are good Broadway songs for a group of 10 girls?
- i need to finde a bedsit in the london borough of barking and dagenham?
- Why get rid of bees/wasps?
- Were there any joint German-Japanese operations in World War 2?
- Were there any joint German-Japanese operations in World War 2?
- How will I revise for my biology test?
- How will I revise for my biology test?
- what are your phobias ?
- Where do honey bees live?
- What are the top 5 must be read by all books?
-
Links
why don’t you go to Wikipedia and see for yourself? This is nothing like it.
http://keyword-discovery.notlong.com
Report Spam/Abuse
It’s been around since 1999, and has some authority which you can see from it’s PageRank. It looks like it changed to it’s new format in 2005. It’s authority may it help it some, but…
It’s not really a mirror. It has taken the information from many sources (including wikipedia and the old answers.com site) and created content based on those articles. So it is technically new content. It was actually a really good way to create new content. Not to mention the content can’t be changed by just anyone, so it is likely to be more accurate than the wikipedia.
http://keyword-discovery.notlong.com
Report Spam/Abuse